The Wargames Research Group rules
that I used for many years insisted that the separation of elements of
an infantry platoon should not exceed 50m. This forced the unit to
remain together in what I think is a somewhat arbitrary 'footprint' and
prevented the tasking of sections out to a flank or, for example, to
spread itself 'too thin' defending a number of canal
bridging points. I suppose the rules were after all designed for
'company level actions' and so such excursions were not part of the
remit. In itself, the 50m separation of elements within a unit relying
on voice and hand signals seem realistic enough to me (in fact, I have
restricted it to 25m when the elements are in cover or drifting smoke).
Green tiddlywink markers: not that intrusive and a visual summary for a solo player |
So how to manage this procedure? Having detached a section on a task which takes it beyond the normal comms separation distance, the morale of this subunit branches off with its own Morale Level. Although separated, parent unit and section do not neccesarily suffer directly as a result but the reduced numbers in each may make them vulnerable under certain circumstances.
Consider
the detached section. It may well have an initial ML of 100 but as it
only consists of three or four elements, the loss of one of them will
reduce the Level by 25-30%, whereas loss of an element in a full
compliment parent unit reduces morale typically by 7-11%. This
replicates the possible vulnerability of sections split away from the
main body. The parent unit, devoid of information regarding the
detachment, does not suffer under these rules until the section rejoins
it at the rendezvous point and any casualties are realised.
I would prefer to avoid whipping out a calculator when reuniting the two parts of the original unit but until I come up with a method, that will have to do. More mulling over ideas and insomnia, no doubt...
I would prefer to avoid whipping out a calculator when reuniting the two parts of the original unit but until I come up with a method, that will have to do. More mulling over ideas and insomnia, no doubt...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feedback welcome!